Team Composition Engine

Build teams by cognitive fit, not personality type.

Myers-Briggs tells you how people prefer to work. We measure how they actually think — across 7 cognitive dimensions, using performance data from real problem-solving under pressure. 8 archetypes. One team composition engine.

Profile your team → Take individual assessment
8
Archetypes
7
Dimensions
30 min
Per Person
$99
Per Member
The Problem

Personality type is not cognitive capability.

Personality assessments

  • Self-reported preferences
  • No performance measurement
  • Low test-retest reliability
  • Labels without actionable data
  • Same result regardless of skill level
  • No team composition analytics
vs

QLM Cognitive Archetypes

  • Performance-based measurement
  • 7 dimensions from real problem-solving
  • Simulation-validated, not self-reported
  • Quantified strengths and blind spots
  • Skill-level-aware classification
  • Team diversity scoring and gap analysis

An INTJ and an ENTJ might both score 90 on Analytical Reasoning or both score 30. Myers-Briggs can’t tell you which. We can — because we measure performance, not preference.

◆
8 Cognitive Archetypes
How your team actually thinks.

Each archetype is defined by its two dominant cognitive dimensions — not self-reported preferences, but measured performance under pressure.

The Architect
Designs systems. Sees structure in chaos.
D1 + D4
The Catalyst
Makes things happen through people.
D6 + D7
The Navigator
Reads situations. Anticipates consequences.
D5 + D1
The Composer
Shapes narratives. Aligns through story.
D3 + D6
The Engineer
Optimizes. Measures. Improves systematically.
D2 + D7
The Sentinel
Detects what others miss.
D5 + D4
The Alchemist
Transforms data into insight.
D1 + D2
The Pioneer
Builds in uncharted territory.
D4 + D7
◆
What You Get
Beyond classification. Team intelligence.

Every feature uses real performance data, not self-reported preferences.

01
Team Archetype Map
See every team member’s primary and secondary archetype at a glance. Understand how your team thinks before you assign work.
02
Cognitive Diversity Score
Shannon entropy across 8 archetypes. Teams that score above 70 outperform homogeneous teams on complex problems. Know your number.
03
Dimension Coverage Heatmap
Which of the 7 cognitive dimensions are well-covered? Which are your blind spots? See team capability gaps in real-time.
04
Blind Spot Analysis
Know exactly which cognitive capabilities your team lacks before a project starts — not after it fails.
05
Optimal Next Hire
Data-driven hiring. See which archetype would most improve your team’s cognitive balance. Stop hiring for culture fit. Hire for cognitive fit.
06
Project Pairing Engine
Match team members to projects based on complementary dimension coverage. The right pair outperforms the best individual.
◆
Pricing
Per member. No recurring fees for the assessment.

One assessment. Permanent cognitive profile. Team analytics included.

Individual
Free
Take the cognitive assessment yourself. Get your archetype and 7-dimension profile.
  • 30-minute assessment
  • 7-dimension cognitive profile
  • Primary + secondary archetype
  • Strengths and blind spots
  • Career transfer recommendations
  • Shareable profile URL
Take assessment free →
Team
$99 / member
Profile your team. Get composition analytics. One-time fee per member.
  • Everything in Individual
  • Team archetype map
  • Cognitive diversity score
  • Dimension coverage heatmap
  • Blind spot analysis
  • Optimal next hire recommendation
  • Project pairing engine
Profile your team →
Enterprise
Custom
Full workforce cognitive analytics. ATS integration. Custom benchmarks.
  • Everything in Team
  • Workforce heatmap dashboard
  • Department-level composition
  • ATS integration (webhook)
  • Hiring cognitive screening
  • Custom role benchmarks
  • SSO (SAML/OIDC)
Talk to Sales →

Know how your team thinks.

30 minutes per person. 8 archetypes. 7 dimensions. One team composition engine that shows you cognitive gaps before they become project failures.

Profile your team → Take individual assessment →