◆ Outcome 1.2 / For students & candidates / Calibrated study allocation

Where should I focus, given six weeks?

You took a diagnostic. You know roughly where you stand. You have six weeks until the exam and you can't fix everything. This outcome takes your dimensional fingerprint plus your time budget and returns a calibrated weekly study plan — which dimensions to prioritize, what content to use, and an honestly bounded prediction of where you'll end up if you do the work.

30-45 min

Time investment

Weekly

Re-allocation

Free

No credit card

For Students

Audience

Build my study plan See what you get back

◆ What you get back · 01

A weekly plan with honest prediction.

The output is a six-week plan calibrated against your dimensional fingerprint and your time budget. You see the predicted score range if you complete the plan, the time allocation per dimension, and the content recommendations week by week. The prediction is honestly bounded — four sources of uncertainty surfaced, not hidden.

SAT · 6 weeks · 8 hours/week available / Plan generated from your fingerprint / Re-calibrates weekly

Plan preview · your six weeks, allocated.

◆ Current → Predicted

1320-1400 → 1380-1490

80% CI · assumes plan completion · external factors ±30-50

◆ Total study commitment

48 hours

Across 6 weeks · 8h/week · weekly check-in 15 min

Geometry & trigonometryD2 · highest leverage · widest CI 3.5 h/wk Sims · Banks · Daily
Quadratic & nonlinear algebraD3 · medium leverage · achievable 2.0 h/wk Banks · targeted practice
Reading vocabulary in contextD4 · medium leverage · slower 1.5 h/wk Daily · vocabulary expansion
Writing & standard EnglishD6 · maintenance only 1.0 h/wk Banks · light review

Week 1

D2 foundations · geom intro

Week 2

D2 + D3 · trig + quad

Week 3

D3 deepen · full practice

Week 4

D4 + D2 review · vocab

Week 5

Full-length · timing

Week 6

Targeted gaps · final

Recommendation: Geometry-trigonometry is your highest-leverage dimension — wide measurement uncertainty plus material headroom plus relatively learnable in six weeks. Quadratic-nonlinear is the second priority because the score impact is substantial and your current pattern suggests you're reconstructing rather than retrieving. Vocabulary takes longer to move; the 1.5h/week is enough for incremental progress, not transformation. What this plan cannot tell you: whether you'll actually do the work. The single largest predictor of improvement is plan completion. Visitors who complete >80% of recommended study see outcomes near the upper end; visitors completing <40% see outcomes near the lower end.

◆ Plan generated · April 28, 2026 · 14:32 EST Re-calibrates weekly · adjustable on demand

Real allocations, real predictions, real uncertainty surfaced. This is what 30-45 minutes returns.

◆ How it works · 02

Four steps. Each one calibrated.

The 30-45 minutes is split across four steps. Most of the time is in step three (review the plan and adjust). The first two steps inherit from your existing diagnostic; the engine builds the plan from data you already produced.

Confirm your fingerprint.

If you've taken a diagnostic recently, the engine uses that. If your last diagnostic is older than 6 months, a brief 10-minute targeted refresh confirms the current state.

0-10 min · depends on history

Name your constraints.

Target exam date. Hours per week available. Study preferences (short daily vs. longer weekly sessions). Constraints are honest inputs, not aspirations.

5 min · your real schedule

iii

Review the calibrated plan.

The engine builds your plan and you review it. Adjust dimensions, see what changes. The prediction updates as you adjust so you see the trade-offs of changing time allocation.

15-25 min · interactive

Commit and check in weekly.

Each week, a 15-minute targeted check-in measures actual progress. Plan re-calibrates if you're ahead or behind. End-of-plan reckoning shows actual vs. predicted.

15 min/wk · ongoing

◆ Methodology · 03

How we know what to recommend.

The allocation engine combines your dimensional fingerprint with research-derived improvement curves and exam-specific dimensional weights. The math is buildable from day one; the predictive validity is being built up via the v1 cohort. Per-claim validation status is published transparently — you see, on every result, whether each claim is validated, calibrated, or in progress.

◆ ITEM POOL

170,000+

Calibrated items across 100+ exams. The Banks recommendation maps each dimension to specific items at appropriate difficulty bands.

◆ IMPROVEMENT CURVES

Calibrated

Dimensional learning rates derived from psychometric research. Some dimensions improve faster than others; the plan reflects this honestly.

◆ PREDICTION VALIDITY

In Progress

Predicted-vs-actual cohort building. By v1 year 1, the prediction model has thousands of completed-cycle data points; until then, the prediction is calibrated rather than validated.

Read the full methodology Per-claim validation status Improvement-curve research

◆ The honest read · 04

What this plan cannot tell you.

A 30-45 minute study allocation gives you a calibrated plan. It does not answer adjacent questions that look similar but require different evidence. Five things this plan cannot speak to, each with the heavier outcome that would.

Whether you'll actually do the work. The plan tells you what work would produce; it cannot tell you what you'll do. The single largest predictor of improvement is plan completion, and that's on you.
Out of scope
Which prep program or tutor would be best for you. We measure cognitive shape and recommend dimensional priorities. We don't review prep companies or tutors and we don't take referral fees from them.
Out of scope
Your realistic ceiling — what you could score with optimal preparation. The plan predicts where you'll be at the target date given your stated time. Ceiling is a different question; that outcome ships when validation cohort matures.
Outcome 1.4 · Live
Whether to take this exam at all rather than another. Some students would score better on the ACT given the same prep time. The comparative-fit outcome answers that question.
Outcome 1.3 · Live
Test-day variability. Real exams have score variation of ±30-50 points across attempts on the same person. The prediction is the model estimate; test-day external factors are not in our model.
External factor

◆ Pricing · 05

Free, with optional Pro tier.

The study allocation outcome is free. No credit card, no time limit, no usage cap. Pro tier ($29/month) covers ongoing development support across multiple outcomes — useful if you're managing several exams or planning long-term capability development beyond a single exam date.

◆ FREE TIER

Free always.

$0 / always

Unlimited study allocation runs for any exam. Weekly check-ins, plan re-calibration, end-of-plan reckoning all included. Profile evidence accumulates whether you upgrade or not.

No credit card required

◆ PRO TIER

Pro tier.

$29 / month

Cross-outcome development support. Includes Outcome 2.5 (career-survival monitoring), priority support, and longitudinal capability tracking. For visitors planning multiple exams or career transitions.

Cancel anytime