3,725 scenario-based questions across 7 role tracks. Adaptive measurement that tells you exactly who on your team can use AI effectively — and who is faking it.
Companies are spending millions on generic “intro to AI” courses. Employees watch videos about transformers and prompt engineering. Completion rates are high. Nothing changes at work.
The board asks “what did we get for that training spend?” and L&D has no number — just completion certificates that prove attendance, not competency.
Most AI training programs skip the measurement step entirely. We start with it — so you know exactly where your people stand before spending a dollar on training.
25-minute adaptive assessment per person. 3,725 scenario-based questions testing actual AI usage — prompt craft, hallucination detection, output verification, tool selection, data privacy. The engine adapts in real time. No two assessments are the same.
Each employee gets a personalized training path based on their assessment results. Only train what’s missing — skip what’s proven. Spaced repetition ensures retention.
L&D leaders: take the assessment yourself first. Your results become the first data point in your team’s heatmap. You evaluate the product by experiencing it — not watching a demo.
Every question is a workplace scenario with 4 plausible options. One is correct. The other three represent real AI adoption failure modes.
For all employees. Tests whether they can use AI effectively in their actual job.
A separate bank for L&D professionals specifically. Tests whether your training designers can design effective AI training programs — needs analysis, Kirkpatrick evaluation, competency frameworks, ROI measurement. Try it →
L&D leaders: take the assessment yourself first. Then invite up to 10 employees free. Upgrade when you're ready.
Take the assessment yourself in 25 minutes. Then invite up to 10 employees free. Know exactly where your team stands on AI.